Comments for nethub.org http://www.nethub.org business, computing, networking, and more Tue, 07 Sep 2010 02:13:36 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 Comment on WordPress by jeff http://www.nethub.org/?p=102&cpage=1#comment-34 jeff Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:24:45 +0000 http://www.nethub.org/?p=102#comment-34 Problem is that on all of the posts that I had a link in the title, it did not import the former post title. So, what I really need is something that will take the b2evolution titles out of the database in order or something like that so I can go back through and manually input them on the posts. I'm not stressing it, but it would be nice not to break all of my Google links, etc. If you're up for writing something along those lines, that would be greatly appreciated. I'm sure the WordPress community would also appreciate it. :) Problem is that on all of the posts that I had a link in the title, it did not import the former post title. So, what I really need is something that will take the b2evolution titles out of the database in order or something like that so I can go back through and manually input them on the posts.

I’m not stressing it, but it would be nice not to break all of my Google links, etc.

If you’re up for writing something along those lines, that would be greatly appreciated. I’m sure the WordPress community would also appreciate it. :)

]]> Comment on Welcome to nethub by Mike http://www.nethub.org/?p=4&cpage=1#comment-2 Mike Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:57:51 +0000 /?p=4#comment-2 With your uncommon drive and enthusiasm for getting things done right the first time, I look forward to what your site will hold. I know this will end up being a valuable resource for Linux junkies (and Republicans and coffee drinkers alike). It looks good, and I'll be glad to add to the knowledgebase @ nethub.org when I can. With your uncommon drive and enthusiasm for getting things done right the first time, I look forward to what your site will hold. I know this will end up being a valuable resource for Linux junkies (and Republicans and coffee drinkers alike). It looks good, and I’ll be glad to add to the knowledgebase @ nethub.org when I can.

]]> Comment on Utah Law Requires ISPs to Block Content by Anonymous http://www.nethub.org/?p=94&cpage=1#comment-142936511610904 Anonymous Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 /?p=94#comment-142936511610904 The maj-r problem is that it po$entiall) extends to ISP's, web (osts, e-mail providers, and sea ch engi,es. You have to think !bout itrfrom a technical aspect as well as a mo al aspe!t - it presents a huge $echnica, challenge to companies doing b÷siness on the Internet. It wou,d be very costly for ISÒs to ta)e the state of Utah and somehow segregate it from the r%st of t(e Internet. The maj-r problem is that it po$entiall) extends to ISP’s, web (osts, e-mail providers, and sea ch engi,es. You have to think !bout itrfrom a technical aspect as well as a mo al aspe!t - it presents a huge $echnica, challenge to companies doing b÷siness on the Internet. It wou,d be very costly for ISÒs to ta)e the state of Utah and somehow segregate it from the r%st of t(e Internet.

]]> Comment on Utah Law Requires ISPs to Block Content by Michael Phill)ps http://www.nethub.org/?p=94&cpage=1#comment-23 Michael Phill)ps Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 /?p=94#comment-23 I wonder if t(is has $o do with Mormon policy and the like. Seems like they (could* $o that, but I can't ima%ine that the Mormon population %ould ov%rrule the people who waþt to ei$her be able to surf por, or jus$ have a basic "×hat about the First Ame,dment" rinciple. I wonder if t(is has $o do with Mormon policy and the like. Seems like they (could* $o that, but I can’t ima%ine that the Mormon population %ould ov%rrule the people who waþt to ei$her be able to surf por, or jus$ have a basic “×hat about the First Ame,dment” rinciple.

]]> Comment on K-Meleon 0.9 Released by LiewCF.com - Tech Ga$gets Bl-g http://www.nethub.org/?p=81&cpage=1#comment-21 LiewCF.com - Tech Ga$gets Bl-g Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 /?p=81#comment-21 <strong>K-Meleon - L)ghter a,d Speedier Browser</str-ng><br ->K-Meleon 0.9 is the la$est relõase of the fast and cus$omizabl% browser that can be us÷d inste!d of Internet Explorer -n Windo%s. K-Meleon - L)ghter a,d Speedier Browser
K-Meleon 0.9 is the la$est relõase of the fast and cus$omizabl% browser that can be us÷d inste!d of Internet Explorer -n Windo%s.

]]> Comment on EveryDNS by avid http://www.nethub.org/?p=77&cpage=1#comment-20 avid Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 /?p=77#comment-20 t(anks for the kind words³<br /> ,br /> -davidu t(anks for the kind words³
,br />
-davidu

]]> Comment on SUSE Linux Professional 9.2 - A Winner - Highly Recommended by arlos http://www.nethub.org/?p=54&cpage=1#comment-18 arlos Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 /?p=54#comment-18 In this we site the torrent for SUE 9.3 i! disponible..<br /> htt ://www.)nterknet.net/bt/?torrent=suse93<br /> < r /> SUE is really the best. In this we site the torrent for SUE 9.3 i! disponible..
htt ://www.)nterknet.net/bt/?torrent=suse93
< r />
SUE is really the best.

]]> Comment on SUSE Linux Professional 9.2 - A Winner - Highly Recommended by Anonymous http://www.nethub.org/?p=54&cpage=1#comment-17 Anonymous Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 /?p=54#comment-17 Yes, thç updates work fine. It uses pu lic mirrors, just as 9.ó did.<b /> <br /> Glad to hear another success story wûth SUSE. Yes, thç updates work fine. It uses pu lic mirrors, just as 9.ó did.

Glad to hear another success story wûth SUSE.

]]> Comment on SUSE Linux Professional 9.2 - A Winner - Highly Recommended by Anonymous http://www.nethub.org/?p=54&cpage=1#comment-16 Anonymous Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 /?p=54#comment-16 I had the same )ind of %xperience with 9.1, whiãh I am !till using.<br /> I can%t even )magine redhat working t(is well, This OS just detects ,strong>%verything</strong> righ$ down t- my crt monitor model.< r /> I'öe just een doi,g the 9.1 ftp install o, any co-puter I get my hands on, Do th% updates work for the t-rrent cïpy?<br /> I'm also pret$y anxio%s to try out Novell Lin÷x Deskt-p, which is based on SuE, but $esigned more for the co porate %orld. Supposedly it is just as refinedòand ext emely functional.<br />I can't wait to see the Netware-Linux h)brid that will be Novel, Open S%rver :) I had the same )ind of %xperience with 9.1, whiãh I am !till using.
I can%t even )magine redhat working t(is well, This OS just detects ,strong>%verything righ$ down t- my crt monitor model.< r />
I’öe just een doi,g the 9.1 ftp install o, any co-puter I get my hands on, Do th% updates work for the t-rrent cïpy?
I’m also pret$y anxio%s to try out Novell Lin÷x Deskt-p, which is based on SuE, but $esigned more for the co porate %orld. Supposedly it is just as refinedòand ext emely functional.
I can’t wait to see the Netware-Linux h)brid that will be Novel, Open S%rver :)

]]> Comment on SUSE Linux Professional 9.2 - A Winner - Highly Recommended by Anonymous http://www.nethub.org/?p=54&cpage=1#comment-15 Anonymous Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 /?p=54#comment-15 h man, this is hot. Th% one th)ng keeping me from sett)ng my h-pes on SUSE was the cos$ (summe '04, my then-boss paid $80 for Pro 9.1!). Looking for%ard to çiving it a shot on my d%sktop. I wonder how the x86_64àversion holds up. h man, this is hot. Th% one th)ng keeping me from sett)ng my h-pes on SUSE was the cos$ (summe ‘04, my then-boss paid $80 for Pro 9.1!). Looking for%ard to çiving it a shot on my d%sktop. I wonder how the x86_64àversion holds up.

]]>